Three completely different terms whose misuse and distortion gives birth to abnormal social phenomena such as racism even on occasions where it does not exist. The terms ‘citizen’ and ‘indigenous’ are not related. The term ‘ethnic’ does contain a sense of ‘indigenous’, however it is still a different definition. As explained, the distortion of the above terms forces the creation of the non-naturally occurring narrative of racism, which is being imposed by its’ so-called critics (anti-racists) even in the societies in which it is being rejected upon its conception.
The legal term ‘citizen’ [ypikoos, literally translated as ‘subordinate’] refers to a person’s political identity, who, as a citizen [literally ‘member of the polity’], conforms to a higher authority, such as the constitution and its enforcement agencies (whoever they may be). It is a strictly legal term.
This issue can be elaborated further. As can be seen, in real democracy, the term ‘subordinate’ (hence, sub-ordinance), cannot exist and cannot be incorporated in the natural term ‘citizen’. In democracy it is the citizen (Politis is the correct term) that dictates policy, and not vice versa. The one that dictates cannot be subordinate as he should be the first one to abide to the legislation that he himself has defined. If this is not the case, then it is not democracy.
This is the starting point of the thinking process, as it has been concluded that the Hellene-citizen is constitutionally subordinate. The term ‘Indigenous’ refers to the individual’s natural capacity from his birth.
Nativity refers to the origins of the human nation [hence Indigenous = ab-original]. This can be easily proven by blood sampling [e.g. Haplo- groups]. There is no human without native status. If for any reason an individual is not aware of their native status this can be easily traced by blood testing, or, in the worst case, by recognition from previous generations or their relatives whose native status cannot be challenged, even among the latest generations (this is one of the negative outcomes of wars, subjugations and forced migrations).
Under no circumstances can a person from a different ethnicity be given native status. This is not a legal term. It has been noted that [in the ‘Hellenic Republic’] a legal term using the same wording (native status) has been created. This leads to the conclusion that this has been done on purpose by the legislature in order to identify ‘native status’ with ‘citizenship’ [subordinance] and thus troll the indigenous people, as current events prove, with their aim being to alienate, by naming, for example, Afghans as indigenous Hellenes, on the basis that they are ‘an-indigenous’ [sic] (another unnatural term that needed to be made up in order to force the defining of non-natives as ‘indigenous’.
[The legislature] has legally defined something that is impossible by nature, hence, in this case legal science has accepted something that is un-natural as legitimate.
People should thoroughly reflect upon the reasons why this happened and what might be the aim and purpose of those that initiated it. The following reflection should assist our train of thought: The term ‘national’ [ethnic] refers to the cultural values of the individual. Sharing the same blood, similar behavior and similar beliefs were three of the main pillars upon which a nation (‘ethnos’) was constituted when the term was first coined by our ancestors. In our days, this strict definition has been altered, and individuals have been included in foreign societies, by means of converting to the indigenous beliefs and behavior. As for the same bloodline, the numerous population mixtures (resulting from endless wars and migrations) have given way and going back two or three generations is a sufficient enough way for a non- indigenous to acquire the so-called ‘national conscience’ through common education and training.
This can cause serious issues to a society when it occurs suddenly and in large numbers. It expresses itself with extensive violations and a peak in criminality. A classic example of this are the United States of America, as well as central and northern Europe where criminal rates are much higher than in Greece and Italy.
Here is thus the third reflection, which joins the other two and co-exists with them in the same space and time. The distortion of these definitions in terms of their natural state in contrast to their current legal status is visible and unquestionable; as well as the distortions they cause to the comparatively healthier western societies such as the Hellenic one (and others, such as the Italian one) who are already experiencing a cultural decline, with the aims being obvious.
A further clarification is given here, so that readers do not jump to erroneous interpretations and conclusions:
The problem is not the individuals that assimilate in a new society, as they, themselves, are victims as well. If those wielding power and resources (in effect, the aggressors of humanity) made sure they did not destroy their societies and supported their economy and freedom, so they could live safely in their own countries, they would not need to leave.
Even if this (stability in their country) occurred today, they would definitely return home. The ones that would stay behind would be the very few ones that have committed crimes in their countries; Thus, it would be very easy to find them and send them to their -by now- properly ruled countries in order to face trial.
The real and specific aggressors are multi-national corporations of every kind, mass media and religions, and equally, their totally subordinate executives, politicians, lawyers, legislators, doctors, journalists, bankers, corporate executives, along with a number of either paid or even independent ‘well-doers’, who left their humanity behind, if ever they had any, who have destroyed the societies of the ‘an-natives’; in the same way, they destroy and will keep destroying the indigenous societies, believing there will be no repercussions on them and that they will survive this anti-human cataclysm.
Racism, because this is what it is all about, is a characteristic of those that create those kinds of situations, and all humans are victims of those individuals. There is now no person on the planet that is not being affected by the racism of the anti-humans that destroy human societies. And this is because racists are not human; humans are all one race, therefore [humans] have no race. Race is a characteristic of animals (e.g. dogs), not the anatomically modern humans of the last few millenniums.
Hence, all humans are being attacked. If we were to categorize humans in races, we would do so along anthropological definitions that define their intellectual level, such as homo sapiens, homo erectus, homo neanderthalensis etc., which today are all extinct by way of natural selection bar one. Categorizing humans depending on their skin colour, religious and political beliefs is inconsistent with the nature of human genes.
This can be simply observed in groups of multi-ethnic societies of young children. No child would see anyone as its inferior, not only humans, but not even animals. There is no such genetic predetermination.
Racism is acquired, and on a first stage is imposed by being made known to our children. A thing that does not exist in nature, it becomes part of their lives; but we, humans, have decided it exists and made it exist in our societies. Also in religions, where redundant rules are being taught, such as thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour, honour thy father and thy mother, thou shalt not commit adultery, to children that have not even thought about committing any of these, and we inform them that they could if they wanted to, but… it is forbidden. Oh really? Does it? As simply as that… almost from birth, we teach them what kind of beasts they can become… as long as they decide to.
If, then, someone is attacking human kind, it goes to show that they themselves cannot be human, but rather, another type of creature definitely, but not human.
Read the Policy Statements of ELLINON SYNELEYSIS regarding HEADING G: NATIONALITY outlining that no one will have more rights than the Sovereign, Native and Indigenous Ellene Politis (Greek Citizen).
Original Version
Read the Policy Statements of ELLINON SYNELEYSIS regarding HEADING G: NATIONALITY outlining that no one will have more rights than the Sovereign, Native and Indigenous Ellene Politis (Greek Citizen).
Original Version
ELLANIOS PHOENIX
THE REBIRTH OF KNOWLEDGE
THE REBIRTH OF THE HUMAN BEING (ANTHROPOS)
No comments:
Post a Comment